C long/short spotting - should we have a dedicated thread?

[spikefader]

FCBP: 'c' is done.

Impulse you little doggy! 'c' long proves itself again.

[RL]

When will the c thread start? I'm Itching to start trading.

[The Photon]

si si spike bring it!! -

[spikefader]

When will the c thread start? I'm Itching to start trading.

si si spike bring it!! -

Oh...ya.....I had thought to keep it in this current thread. Should I start a whole new one?

Karel, wat wilt u me doen?
(http://www.worldlingo.com/en/product...ranslator.html)

[Karel]

Oh...ya.....I had thought to keep it in this current thread. Should I start a whole new one?

Karel, wat wilt u me doen?
(http://www.worldlingo.com/en/product...ranslator.html)

I want to hit you over the head for mangling our beautiful language! (Your Dutch translates back as: What do you want to do to me) It appears that Dutch has some peculiar difficulties. A better translation would have been: Wat wil je dat ik doe? = Wat do you want that I do? (informal "je" instead of formal "u" please! I am not your broker!) Or: Wat zal ik doen? = What should I do?

Now, Peijnenborg, what about an answer? Well, I think there is a lot of discussion here already, so why not keep it here? If the poll starts to bore you, I think it could even be removed.

Regards,

Karel

[RL]

Spike why not keep It where It Is?

[jiesen]

how about taking a poll to decide where to put it?

[mimo_100]

compromise

how about a compromise -- leave this thread for ongoing discussion,
then start a new thread just for entries and exits.
Tim

[spikefader]

...I think it could even be removed....

Removed!!!???!!! lolol oh Karel! heh, you strike a deep wound to the hearts of us 'c' connoisseurs for not seeing the value! lolol
Perhaps it's because of my failure to define rules and precise methodology and specifically identify why "it is supposed to work". Frankly, I thought there were enough examples in the charts I've posted in my thread to at least raise interest, which is what appears to have occurred with an overwhelming percentage if you look at the poll results

But I'm not seriously fussed Karel. I can keep all this mess in my thread if you want. I thought I might encourage others to act as spotters and throw the symbols up if they happen to see one. I like to see 'em. There's enough of them occur out there, and enough that work wonderfully.

The suggestion it can be removed if I get bored with the thread is a little dismissive of what others have voted for. This thread wasn't designed for me; but the rest of the forum dude. In the face of the poll results, in the face of the encouraging replies, and in the face of a suggestion it become a sticky is somewhat dismissive and inconsiderate of the broader MM audience Karel, not to mention you hurt my feelings ~waaaaahhahahaha~ hehe

jejejeje (it's contagious that laffter)


But seriously, I don't think I need to define strict terms cuz the pictures speak for themselves. If someone wants to work out the statistics, have at it. Anyone willing to do an in-depth system analysis of the likelihood of success, volunteers are welcome. The purpose of this thread is as the title clearly indicates. It's a heads up thread so that maybe a few of us knuckleheads can make a few bucks. In my view a 'c' is a valid entry area, and defines a strong and logical low risk stop location in a very simple manner. It ain't rocket science.

Sure, it's breakin' all the rules, but shoo, sometimes rules just gotta be broken......when they are just ridiculously complicated and uncertain for sure, which is what strict EW is in my view.

Great risk/reward and potential for impulse move is all I'm lookin for. I'm sure not looking to impress Academia. If they don't get impressed by what I see as obvious then Academia needs an uppercut.

Make 'em pretty dudes!

[spikefader]

I want to hit you over the head for mangling our beautiful language!

heh, a thousand apologies my friend. It was not my intention. I cannot boast my language skills at all. I used that silly translator thingy just fer fun. I typed in proper English and it spits out that. Who designs these things! lol Maybe ya get what you pay for; it was free obviously hehe

Is there a good one you can recommend? I don't wanna learn Dutch yet lol

[Karel]

Hi spike, rest assured: I was just talking about removing the poll, not this thread! Bless me! What do you think?

I wouldn't know about a good place for Machine Translation English > Dutch. Perhaps the one you used is good enough. I guess that when you use sentences with lots of concrete words, things will be alright. ("When you mix concrete, don't add too much sand" > "Wanneer u beton mengt, voeg teveel zand niet toe"; crummy, but understandable). Short sentences without concrete words might backfire.

Regards,

Karel

[spikefader]

OPLK in the 'b'

[spikefader]

Hi spike, rest assured: I was just talking about removing the poll, not this thread! Bless me! What do you think?

I wouldn't know about a good place for Machine Translation English > Dutch. Perhaps the one you used is good enough. I guess that when you use sentences with lots of concrete words, things will be alright. ("When you mix concrete, don't add too much sand" > "Wanneer u beton mengt, voeg teveel zand niet toe"; crummy, but understandable). Short sentences without concrete words might backfire.

Regards,

Karel

Ahhh! I think poorly! lol Apologies for doubting you! hehe

OK, yes, remove the poll. I think it suffices that we've observed the results were 95% yes.

Thnx fer the language comments.
"When you mix concrete, joint too much sand not" hehe

[alice4321us]

Where to buy

OPLK in the 'b'

What should be the entry and exit price for this.

To enhance my knowledge, do we buy in b or c or after c completes. How to know if c is complete.

Thanks

[alice4321us]

IBM a short candidate

SHS formation. Neckline break a 81. Any charts would be helpful.