The Fed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Fed

    May 9, 2006 -- THE high price of gasoline is starting to kill the economy: More than 100,000 jobs would probably have been lost last month if Washington hadn't made some very optimistic assumptions.

    That's what the Federal Reserve should be considering tomorrow when it decides whether 15 consecutive interest rates hikes is enough. But it won't even come up because the facts I'm about to tell you aren't the kind that are shared by government agencies.

    Last Friday, the Labor Department officially announced that only 138,000 jobs were created in April. That won't even cover the number of new people entering the workforce.

    Wall Street had been expecting 200,000 new jobs, so investors used the disappointing employment number as an excuse to rally stocks based on the misguided belief that a weak economy is somehow good for corporations.

    It isn't, except for the near-term and fleeting benefit that the Fed will have to think before it pulls the trigger on more interest rate hikes. The main idea behind the rate increases was to slow speculation in the housing market. That's starting to happen, but the bigger problem is that the rest of the economy isn't nearly as perky as the statistics suggest.

    Take Friday's employment report as an example. The Labor Department had to work some statistical magic to even come up with the inadequate 138,000 job figure, which included a whopping 271,000 positions it believes - but can't prove - were created by newly formed companies.



    The government doesn't actually know if these new companies exist. The Bureau of Labor Statistics calls this its birth/death model.

    The 271,000 jobs amounted to a much more optimistic assumption than even last April's guesstimate.

    Do the math. Without those estimated 271,000 jobs from new companies the country would have lost 133,000 jobs last month - not gained 138,000.

    A chunk of those 271,000 jobs probably do exist, but the number is a guess.

    And with the recent spike in oil prices there are probably more companies disappearing than the government thinks. So, unless oil prices give the economy a break, don't be surprised if you start hearing the words recession and stagflation.

    The last backward-looking economic statistic was the 4.8 percent annualized growth in the gross domestic product reported recently by Washington for this year's first quarter. That number was as great as it was deceptive.

    For each tick up in inflation, the GDP comes down by a tick.

    The April jobs report was a warning sign. It should have been good - very good. Instead it was worse than it looked.


    Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke had better take note. With energy prices already eating up so much of consumer's incomes, the Fed shouldn't push interest rates any higher.

    [email protected]
  • billyjoe
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2003
    • 9014

    #2
    Despite what the government tells us , the new jobs being created at least here in northern Ohio are mostly minimum or slightly above minimum wage and service oriented. These employees will never be able to buy homes or new cars.What percentage of McDonald's realistically ever make it to management level?The historically good jobs , those connected to manufacturing , especially in the auto industry are not so slowly fading away. All of the former big 3 auto makers had plants within 7 miles of my home. GM became Delphi and is for sale. Ford became Visteon , then back to Ford and is for sale. Chrysler sold out. The remaining workers are being replaced by temps and new non-union hires at sometimes less than 50% of previous pay. The local economy is collapsing . Homes for sale are increasing while actual homes sold is decreasing. Foreclosures fill the local papers' classified ad section. Small retail businesses including mine are closing daily. The local hospital is the largest employer , but with fewer area folks covered by insurance , how long will they last?
    Washington tells us things are looking up. Well things are looking down in my part of the country. That's our yardstick for judging the economy.
    billyjoe

    Comment


    • #3
      I read an article over the weekend that said new employment is best in the (no surprise) sunbelt states and worst in rust belt states. Last year, for the first time, St. Louis had more service sector jobs than manufacturing jobs. The former doesn't pay nearly as much as the latter, of course.

      Comment

      • mrmarket
        Administrator
        • Sep 2003
        • 5971

        #4
        NY4Ever..you are right on. Greenspan ruined the market last time with his unnecessary hikes.
        =============================

        I am HUGE! Bring me your finest meats and cheeses.

        - $$$MR. MARKET$$$

        Comment

        Working...
        X