Originally posted by Rob
a) it's unfair and sexist to suggest that anyone who happens to be wearing panties (hopefully ladies only jejeje) can't trade effectively and make money or limit losses selling those so-called "good companies"
and
b) it implies that selling or shorting so-called "fundamentally good companies" is "ineffectual", despite the repeated evidence of late to the contrary.
As I see it, technically weak stocks should be sold to limit losses. They should be shorted to increase profits.
Either way, the bottom line is that if it's a choice between producing the goods and being called a panty-waist it's a no-brainer - give me the label!
It has nothing to do with gender. It has nothing to do with fear. It's not personal.
But it has everything to do with reality, what really is, or might be, and admitting that some things occur for reasons beyond the fundamental.
Have a great weekend dude!

Leave a comment: