Last night I sat down and checked out the "story" behind IIG (amex) and how StockLemon and Mark Cuban have been "negative" on the stock for the last 2 years. As we know, Cuban has been wrong many time more than he has been right and he can loose millions and he wouldn't care. But StockLemon is one that clearly states that they take a position BEFORE writing an negative opinion and can cover their position or add to it at any time without any disclosure.
I won't bore you with all of the facts but here are some of the conlusions I have reached:
1) The stock has 10.2 million float with 5.1 million (yes, 50%) of it sold short as of last filing. Also, check out the number (30+) of "days to cover" based on 50-day avg volume ---> http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_ful...t&selected=IIG
2) It seems that RipoffReports.com has just issued a "clean bill of health" on IIG. This had been one of the big reasons why StockLemon was negative as RipoffReports had been hounding IIG for years.--> http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff218805.htm
3) Funny thing is that when this postive report finally came in, StockLemon accused RipoffReports of being "paid off" by IIG to issue it. Huh? Unlike SockLemon, RipoffReports.com does NOT trade in stocks they cover. Also, they cover hundres of companies which don't even trade on any stock market. So, what would they gain except for loosing their reputation?
4) Here are the stats of the what has happened to the stock price of IIG when the last 6 reports were issued by StockLemon.com:
04/18/2006 - IIG pps $11.62
09/12/2006 - IIG pps $13.45
09/14/2006 - IIG pps $14.00
11/02/2006 - IIG pps $17.15
11/06/2006 - IIG pps $18.21
11/08/2006 - IIG pps $19.03
5) To my eyes, the company is delivering great numbers, has a low P/E and best of all announced a stock buy-back in September.
6) Now, to the charts. I think that it had a major break out just yesterday on huge volume. I love the fact that it did not gap-up further today as it is slowly being digested and a "slower & steady" rise in much better for the longer term than parabolic. (please copy and paste the COMPLETE links as some of these are getting truncated)
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?c=iig,uu[h,a]dhclyymy[pb10!b30!b50!d20,2][vc60][iub14!la12,26,9!lp14,3,3!lf!lc20]
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/S...iig,PLTADANRBO[PA][D][F1!3!!!2!20]&pref=G
I would love to hear from other folks on what they think? Also, if someone wants to draw-up a good chart for us to see, that would be wonderful!
I won't bore you with all of the facts but here are some of the conlusions I have reached:
1) The stock has 10.2 million float with 5.1 million (yes, 50%) of it sold short as of last filing. Also, check out the number (30+) of "days to cover" based on 50-day avg volume ---> http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/quotes_ful...t&selected=IIG
2) It seems that RipoffReports.com has just issued a "clean bill of health" on IIG. This had been one of the big reasons why StockLemon was negative as RipoffReports had been hounding IIG for years.--> http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ripoff218805.htm
3) Funny thing is that when this postive report finally came in, StockLemon accused RipoffReports of being "paid off" by IIG to issue it. Huh? Unlike SockLemon, RipoffReports.com does NOT trade in stocks they cover. Also, they cover hundres of companies which don't even trade on any stock market. So, what would they gain except for loosing their reputation?
4) Here are the stats of the what has happened to the stock price of IIG when the last 6 reports were issued by StockLemon.com:
04/18/2006 - IIG pps $11.62
09/12/2006 - IIG pps $13.45
09/14/2006 - IIG pps $14.00
11/02/2006 - IIG pps $17.15
11/06/2006 - IIG pps $18.21
11/08/2006 - IIG pps $19.03
5) To my eyes, the company is delivering great numbers, has a low P/E and best of all announced a stock buy-back in September.
6) Now, to the charts. I think that it had a major break out just yesterday on huge volume. I love the fact that it did not gap-up further today as it is slowly being digested and a "slower & steady" rise in much better for the longer term than parabolic. (please copy and paste the COMPLETE links as some of these are getting truncated)
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?c=iig,uu[h,a]dhclyymy[pb10!b30!b50!d20,2][vc60][iub14!la12,26,9!lp14,3,3!lf!lc20]
http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/S...iig,PLTADANRBO[PA][D][F1!3!!!2!20]&pref=G
I would love to hear from other folks on what they think? Also, if someone wants to draw-up a good chart for us to see, that would be wonderful!
Comment