BOOM ==> The Hello 2008 Winner!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New-born baby
    replied
    BOOM may just take out your target price in the next 4-6 weeks, Ernie. Very nice inverted head and shoulders, and of all things!: today it retested (successfully) the R line now turned to support! Things are lookin' up for Ernie's BOOM pick.

    Er, uh, by the way . . . if it does take out the target price, I'd, uh, I'd try to make sure that I was awake at the sell switch because it will have then formed a triple top, and probably won't make it past that big R at $64. Comprende, amigo?

    Leave a comment:


  • New-born baby
    replied
    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    I also think C is screwed. They are so big, and so widespread, many of their managers have been trying to hide the bad news so they can get still get their bonuses.
    It ain't easy to fool Ernie.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    I also think C is screwed. They are so big, and so widespread, many of their managers have been trying to hide the bad news so they can get still get their bonuses.

    Leave a comment:


  • New-born baby
    replied
    Originally posted by skiracer View Post
    I haven't looked at any of the fundamentals. They might be great but the chart isn't showing anything right now. Timing has to taken into consideration on any play with a time frame. In this case 4/6 wks. is just a long swing trade. It might get to the target or it might not but the timing of any entry in correlation with what the chart is saying on the technical side has to be taken into consideration. The fact that a number of the faithful have waited until after the fact of Ernie's entry looking for the lower entry point gives evidence to that. I don't see the play myself but I know that timing is of the utmost importance. It makes a big difference in the entire trade regardless of the strength of the stock fundamently. They go up and down in cycles on selling and buying strategies as other traders take gains. It's imperative that it be hit at the best time.
    Aw Ski, there you go again: talkin' good sense. Please don't confuse us with the facts when we've already made up our minds. Why you do it, I don't know . . . . lol.

    Yup, I agree with you. This is a long swing trade, 4-6 weeks, so market timing does have to be taken into account. I am sitting in ca$$$$h, and have been for awhile, and will continue to do so until after January 15, when C announces earnings. Folks, ya best watch that one, because if C disappoints (I think it will) the market tanks hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • skiracer
    replied
    I haven't looked at any of the fundamentals. They might be great but the chart isn't showing anything right now. Timing has to taken into consideration on any play with a time frame. In this case 4/6 wks. is just a long swing trade. It might get to the target or it might not but the timing of any entry in correlation with what the chart is saying on the technical side has to be taken into consideration. The fact that a number of the faithful have waited until after the fact of Ernie's entry looking for the lower entry point gives evidence to that. I don't see the play myself but I know that timing is of the utmost importance. It makes a big difference in the entire trade regardless of the strength of the stock fundamently. They go up and down in cycles on selling and buying strategies as other traders take gains. It's imperative that it be hit at the best time.
    Last edited by skiracer; 01-11-2008, 03:05 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jiesen
    replied
    Originally posted by Websman View Post
    If you don't mind Jeisen, I may spam the Yahoo board a little myself. I'm off work, it's cold, and I have nothing better to do.
    what a coincidence, me too!

    Leave a comment:


  • Websman
    replied
    Originally posted by jiesen View Post
    Ok, I upped my limit until it hit at 50.8, so now I'm in, and will fearlessly spam the Yahoo! board with my opinion. I probably paid $2 more than I had to for this one, but I think when it hits $64 in 4-6 weeks, it won't really matter anymore whether I paid 48 or 50 for it.
    If you don't mind Jeisen, I may spam the Yahoo board a little myself. I'm off work, it's cold, and I have nothing better to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • jiesen
    replied
    Originally posted by tintin View Post
    Jiesen:

    One of your drug stocks AMGN should hit it big soon.
    Saw this

    /www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=11EMBZ3KHHWTTQFIQMFCFFOAVCBQ YIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/10/ndrug110.xml

    the etanercept drug is Embrel, which is from AMGN.
    I am familiar with Tumor Necrosis Factor and the TNF blocker seems to offer some real hope for Alzheimer's patients.
    This could indeed be big.
    That is indeed, HUGE, tintin! Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Never heard about this before. I thought ELN would be the one to bring the first effective Alzheimer's treatment to market, but this could very well change things, if it works as well as the article describes.

    Leave a comment:


  • jiesen
    replied
    Bot BOOM!

    Ok, I upped my limit until it hit at 50.8, so now I'm in, and will fearlessly spam the Yahoo! board with my opinion. I probably paid $2 more than I had to for this one, but I think when it hits $64 in 4-6 weeks, it won't really matter anymore whether I paid 48 or 50 for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Websman
    replied
    Load up on BOOM while you can...It's bargain time!

    YEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • jiesen
    replied
    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    Jiesen, where's your yahoo spam?
    oops... meant to do that, but got sidetracked. It's on its way!
    Last edited by jiesen; 01-11-2008, 02:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    Originally posted by jiesen View Post
    damn, just missed it. I had my order in for 48.5 today, but it didn't get below 49...
    Jiesen, where's your yahoo spam?

    Leave a comment:


  • jiesen
    replied
    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    Wow...up 7% today. Nice move Ex-lax...hope someone caught the dip.
    damn, just missed it. I had my order in for 48.5 today, but it didn't get below 49...

    Leave a comment:


  • IIC
    replied
    Originally posted by New-born baby View Post

    Here's good New Years advice: don't buy CFC.
    Geez...I was all set to buy at the open today...till your post convinced me not to

    Leave a comment:


  • tintin
    replied
    Boom very nice, Drug stocks

    Originally posted by jiesen View Post
    I think there are plenty of great stocks in this list- but nary a haircut among them today: (it's just my list of big-pharma stocks that I check out periodically, MRK is the only one I've ever bought... still wish I'd kept it!)
    LLY, NVS, DNA, AMGN would be among my top picks right now.

    Jiesen:

    One of your drug stocks AMGN should hit it big soon.
    Saw this

    /www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=11EMBZ3KHHWTTQFIQMFCFFOAVCBQ YIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/10/ndrug110.xml

    the etanercept drug is Embrel, which is from AMGN.
    I am familiar with Tumor Necrosis Factor and the TNF blocker seems to offer some real hope for Alzheimer's patients.
    This could indeed be big.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X