Did I miss the June 2018 results?
Rules for Pick of The Year (PoTY) 2018
Collapse
X
-
The Shorts appear smarter than the Longs this year and I tip my hat to them. However, and as previously mentioned, the maximum short gain is 100%, and there is still time for those longs swinging for the fences with >100% gains.
Always a fun contest and thank you JohnHenry for your work!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Louetta View PostI actually DO have a shot at finishing last again.
Somehow I believe my pick going down to -74% is a better bet than yours going down to -84%!
POTY's getting exciting this time around, methinks...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by tiedyed1 View PostThe Shorts appear smarter than the Longs this year and I tip my hat to them. However, and as previously mentioned, the maximum short gain is 100%, and there is still time for those longs swinging for the fences with >100% gains.
Always a fun contest and thank you JohnHenry for your work!
I second the motion.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Louetta View PostFrankly I think this 100% stuff is nonsense. In real life if I short 100 shares at $10 Schwab (my broker) will credit my account with 100x$10-$4.95 commission or $995.05. Let us say the shares now go to $0 (bankruptcy, delisting, etc.). Schwab will make me execute a transaction to close the position before they free up the money and charge me $4.95, just like any trade. So my profit on the trade is $995.05 - $4.95 or $990.10 at a cost (in real dollars) of $9.90 for the two trades, essentially 10,000%. In the contest we ignore commissions on all the longs so if we do so for the shorts the original credit is $1000 and the cost of the closing transaction is $0 or an infinite gain, in my book.
(i.e. I am shooting for my pick, TRVN, to more than double (up >100%) by 12/31/2018.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Louetta View PostSo my profit on the trade is $995.05 - $4.95 or $990.10 at a cost (in real dollars) of $9.90 for the two trades, essentially 10,000%.Last edited by BlueWolf; 10-02-2018, 10:09 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by tiedyed1 View PostI see that perspective and maybe it is semantics, but I look at the 100% as yield from the initial position: (Not taking into account trade fees) a short's maximum potential is to yield 100% of their initial position; while a long has the potential to yield over 100% of their initial position.
(i.e. I am shooting for my pick, TRVN, to more than double (up >100%) by 12/31/2018.)
Well, I swung for the fences and looks like I missed on this one (TRVN): https://endpts.com/trevena-crushed-a...-new-pain-med/
I may be competing for last place this year.
Comment
-
Comment