Originally posted by skiracer
View Post
I agree that technical analysis is important. But, and this is an important 'but', no technical analysis went into the experiment at all. Using TA may or may not have improved an investor's return. That's not the purpose of the experiment, however. The purpose was to take the 'best' IBD rated stocks at that particular time, according to the screen parameters, and blindly buy them at the time that their ratings were better than the rest of the stocks on the same list. The screen reduced the group of 100 stocks to only 6 that fit all of the parameters. ONLY 6! Those 6 had the highest ratings according to IBD at the start of the experiment- "better than the rest"
One would think that these highly rated stocks would perform well against the market, given the high rating they received. All 6 are currently priced below their respective prices at the beginning of the experiment.
What conclusions can / should be drawn from this information, if any?
I highly recommend reviewing the entirety of this thread- start at the beginning. It is not only entertaining, but highly informative.
Comment