I have 22 consecutive profitable trades of 15% or better. How is this possible? Every day there are hundreds of stocks setting new highs, no matter what happens in the overall market. Many of these stocks are still at very reasonable valuations. Afraid of buying stocks at their highs? Think of it this way: a new high is really a future floor for companies with solid financial underpinnings. Quantitative momentum modeling makes it easy to identify stocks that can continue this upward momentum trend. Why does this happen? It's really very simple..ask me about what investors and cows have in common. I am $$$ MR. MARKET $$$. I AM HUGE!!! Bring me your finest meats and cheeses. You can join in on the fun. Register for free and you'll be able to post messages on this forum and also receive emails when $$$ MR. MARKET $$$ makes his own trades. ($$$MR. MARKET$$$ is a proprietary investor and does not provide individual financial advice. The stocks mentioned on this forum do not represent individual buy or sell recommendations and should not be viewed as such. Individual investors should consider speaking with a professional investment adviser before making any investment decisions.)
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
End of month window dressing providing great selling opportunity.
Window dressing is done at the end of the qtr, not month. FYI
Perhaps that is why he referred specifically to EoM window dressing? "Window dressing" is a not uncommon expression and can hardly be expected to refer exclusively to the generally recognized phenomenon you refer to.
As long as neither party shows either the logic behind EoM window dressing or its non-existence, this is a moot point.
Regards,
Karel
My Investopedia portfolio
(You need to have a (free) Investopedia or Facebook login, sorry!)
Karel, mutual funds and large institutional investors pretty up their holdings on a quarterly, not a monthly, basis. In part this is done to coincide with quadruple witching.
You have to understand Garbo - he's been "blaming" the market's rise on window dressing, manipulation, etc., since 2003.
Karel, mutual funds and large institutional investors pretty up their holdings on a quarterly, not a monthly, basis. In part this is done to coincide with quadruple witching.
You have to understand Garbo - he's been "blaming" the market's rise on window dressing, manipulation, etc., since 2003.
How exquisitely beside my point! If you had made at least some attempt to understand my post, you would have realized that I fully understand that mechanism. But to disqualify a statement about EoM window dressing purely on the ground that something else is called window dressing, sounds somewhat like mentioning in a discussion of binary trees, "Don't you know that you find trees only in a wood?"
Please understand that I am not defending the existence of EoM window dressing. That is up to NY4Ever. But if this is your way to elicit further information from him on the subject, you choose a strange and unpleasant way to go about it.
Regards,
Karel
My Investopedia portfolio
(You need to have a (free) Investopedia or Facebook login, sorry!)
OK Dave, apparently your opinion is that when words have a definition in the investing world, they can no longer be used on this board in any other meaning, however valid in other contexts, and however qualified in other ways. It seems a rather stupid position, but I am glad to know it is yours.
With this cleared up, can we now return to the topic of this thread, in a way that actually contributes to the topic and the forum, or do you prefer to continue your volley of snide remarks?
Regards,
Karel
My Investopedia portfolio
(You need to have a (free) Investopedia or Facebook login, sorry!)
<< OK Dave, apparently your opinion is that when words have a definition in the investing world, they can no longer be used on this board in any other meaning, however valid in other contexts, and however qualified in other ways. >>
This is an investing board, is it not? The phrase "window dressing" is a term of art, which has a specific meaning in the investment world. Why would you want to use a definition unrelated to investments on an investment board?
And how were my remarks snide? I dared to disagree with you so that makes them snide?
<< OK Dave, apparently your opinion is that when words have a definition in the investing world, they can no longer be used on this board in any other meaning, however valid in other contexts, and however qualified in other ways. >>
This is an investing board, is it not? The phrase "window dressing" is a term of art, which has a specific meaning in the investment world. Why would you want to use a definition unrelated to investments on an investment board?
And how were my remarks snide? I dared to disagree with you so that makes them snide?
Why? Why not? As long as there can be no confusion, f.i. because the term is properly qualified, why not?
And, Dave, perhaps your referring to Ny4Ever as Garbo isn't snide. But then please explain what it is, and how it is supposed to contribute to this board.
Regards,
Karel
My Investopedia portfolio
(You need to have a (free) Investopedia or Facebook login, sorry!)
Karel, I call him Garbo because that's one of the many screen names he used for years on AOL. Those of us who came over from AOL know him as Garbo. Maybe he vants to be alone....<VBG>
To use the term "end of month window dressing" is like using the term "a positive negative number." Window dressing is a term of art that in the investment world, specifically refers to end-of-quarter buying and selling by mutual funds and other large institutional investors.
You do realize that your simile with "positive negative number" has a big hole, in the sense that it would be hard to give a meaning for "negative number" other than the precise mathematical one? Whereas "window dressing" has an original meaning, a figurative meaning, and a special version of that figurative meaning for the financial world?
And that "Maybe he vants to be alone....<VBG>", with slang and all, is what makes your activities in this thread so suspect. If that is what he wants, why don't you leave him alone? Just check your posts in this thread, and, apart from our discussion, they are just <VBG> posts, aimed at the original poster. Why not stop with that nonsense? Few people would appreciate that kind of interference with their threads.
Regards,
Karel
My Investopedia portfolio
(You need to have a (free) Investopedia or Facebook login, sorry!)
<< And that "Maybe he vants to be alone....<VBG>", with slang and all, is what makes your activities in this thread so suspect. If that is what he wants, why don't you leave him alone? >>
Karel, "I vant to be left alone" was a line Greta Garbo spoke in the movie, "Grand Hotel." I was making a play on that line.
Comment