Homersays

[Rob]

Does that mean I should remove my life sized poster of $$$Mr. Market$$$ from the wall in my workshop.

LOL ... I've been in your rat's nest ... er .. I mean office at your machine shop, and the picture I remember seeing was Louis Rukeyser. heh heh

[IIC]

Well...I've been around the block more than a few times...No, I am not perfect...But Yes...I can spot a Con man a mile or 5,000 miles away...Actually, I am surprised at Jim...He seems like a smart guy...Not much of a sense of humor (Which I have no problem with)...But I am surprised that he is caught up in the Homer Hoopla...

Homer...You are an inexperienced novice who reads a little and has some big ideas...My Crystal Ball says you will be a failure at your con game...In fact it says: Homer...Illusions Of Grandeur...IIC

[Lyehopper]

LOL ... I've been in your rat's nest ... er .. I mean office at your machine shop, and the picture I remember seeing was Louis Rukeyser. heh heh

LOL!!!! I did used to have a picture of him above my desk didn't I? SsSsSsSsss! Dude, You have a great memory!

Hey Rob, I just posted about you on the millionaires site.LOL! Catfish is spooked by me. He thinks that maybe I'm an "operative"....

http://www.marketmillionaires.com/hot-investment-tips-stock-picks/5308-you-ready-commit-making-money-market.html

[IIC]

LOL!!!! I did used to have a picture of him above my desk didn't I? SsSsSsSsss! Dude, You have a great memory!

Hey Rob, I just posted about you on the millionaires site.LOL! Catfish is spooked by me. He thinks that maybe I'm an "operative"....

http://www.marketmillionaires.com/ho...ey-market.html

H*ll...If I was Catfish...you'd already be banned...I give him 12 hours to ban you...LOL

C'mon Lye...Look for a challenge...Don't pick on that poor little kitty...It is too easy...Step up to the plate Big Guy

[Homersays]

You are right Homey...Lull does mean pause...But "Indicate"...I'd say "Hinted" is a better term...And you know why they hinted? My guess is that you don't know...And my second guess is that you have contacts that don't know what the h*ll they are talking about...And my third guess is that there are not over 1800 naive suckers here...But that there is definately at least one.

Question for you Mr. Know It All...Why don't you enlighten us about the effect of the addition of almost $24 Bil to the Repo Pool today???

Personally this is my take on you...You read what's available publically...You know a few people who know more about the markets than you do...And you talk with authority so that mindless suckers listen...But in the end you are full of it...You really have no idea what controls the action or what is going to happen...You have some ulterior motive to create a cult following IMO...But you know what a cult is?...It is made up of a bunch of mindless non-thinkers who cannot fend for themselves...H*ll...I post what I think as many others do...Right or Wrong...I do not try to sway people to my way for personal gain...You are not a good guy...you are not a person who can be trusted...You have an ulterior motive...If I was in charge here I would ban you...I don't like people like you...IIC

You are sick ! You are perfect for the mentality of this board. My ulterior motive as you call it was only to help by providing useful and as proven accurate forecasts based on good information. I'll come back when you are banned.

[Tatnic]

Try again next month, Garbo. LOL!

gomer's philosophy is to make hundreds of calls on the chance that he gets 1%~2% correct. He's really nothing but a cnbc junkie who regurgitates cramers calls, that would explain his piss poor record.

[Tatnic]

#25 06-12-2006, 04:26 PM
Homersays
Member Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 83

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Smith
I am seeing things just starting to breakdown from support levels and trendlines.....for you to say a real bounce is coming anywhere near here is ridiculous.


Cover your shorts before the end of the month if not sooner. Ridiculous? I don't think so. Stay tuned.

To give gomer some credit, since he rarely gets it right, he was right about the oversold nature of the markets. Smitty was wrong to be so bearish at the extremes, but its human nature to mimic the mood of the market so he wasn't alone. Rob New was also very bearish, and may still be.

[Rob]

To give gomer some credit, since he rarely gets it right, he was right about the oversold nature of the markets. Smitty was wrong to be so bearish at the extremes, but its human nature to mimic the mood of the market so he wasn't alone. Rob New was also very bearish, and may still be.

Yeah, sure, I'll give him credit for that. But like I said, he was a little late, since I was at least four days ahead of him on that one. But now don't y'all dare give ol' Rob any credit, you bunch o' sycophantic dopes.

[skiracer]

Yeah, sure, I'll give him credit for that. But like I said, he was a little late, since I was at least four days ahead of him on that one. But now don't y'all dare give ol' Rob any credit, you bunch o' sycophantic dopes.

I think that almost all of us have to take a reality check on ourselves. Look what Homer has done with us. It's like a cancer that grows subtly within until it poisons the whole body. I said it in an earlier post that we should just ignore him and let him shrivel up and go away. Without the food of controversy, that he thrives on and the trap that we so subtly fall into, he wouldn't be able to continue. We are the fuel that he so eagerly consumes. Like I said earlier. Whether he got lucky or not or if they raise the rates by whatever they want to raise them is not the significant question. What is important is picking winning stocks and boy is the discussion drifting away from those topics. We should let Homer shrivel up and go away. In his last post he promised to not return until Doug gets banned. Another post to further fuel the controversy and provide his with more fuel. Really who are the foolish ones? Us or Homer. I want to see if he is going to stick to his word and stay off until Doug gets banned.
By the way although I don't condone the rules practice of what the Millionaires site is doing maybe they have been looking around the internet and have decided they want to be different than the typical forums that are a dime a dozen. We kind of invade their site and mock them for setting standards they want to uphold. Has anyone noticed that we have lost a fairly decent number of pretty good people and their contributing efforts over the past few months. Maybe we all have to look within to do a little judging. An I'm including myself right up there at the top of the list.

[Jim Smith]

Homer helps the board

I don't care how he comes across information.....Many fundamental analysts use the mosaic method combined with intuition.....All I care about is I make money reading his posts....At first, I may disagree vehemently but I've learned over the years of reading Homer not to write him off as a kook.....I especially like that Homer is all business....There's no foofy posts unrelated to the markets.....

[Homersays]

I don't care how he comes across information.....Many fundamental analysts use the mosaic method combined with intuition.....All I care about is I make money reading his posts....At first, I may disagree vehemently but I've learned over the years of reading Homer not to write him off as a kook.....I especially like that Homer is all business....There's no foofy posts unrelated to the markets.....

Thanks for your support Jim, but it is obvious that information I provide is not welcomed by many on this board. So be it. Good luck trading.

[IIC]

How many times is Homer gonna quit?

Let me explain something...In all honesty my intent was only to give him a hard time until he apologized for calling everyone on this board a sucker who could never make any money. It has nothing to do with right calls/wrong calls...None of us are right all the time.

When I've made inappropriate comments I was big enough to publically apologize...If he would do the same that would be the end of it as far as I'm concerned...Doug(IIC)

[Tatnic]

Huh?

Shades of 1987.

If I know you, you were trying to say we were headed for a huge collapse ala '87. Boy, talk about an empty vessell (your head). The only similarities between then and now were that both fed chiefs were new to the job. Greenspan got plunked down right in the middle of a huge crisis and gained a ton of respect for his calm demeanor. Ben hasn't gained that respect yet...but in all fairness to him he's in a very tough spot and if he can manage to keep inflation in check without ruining the economy he will earn a ton of respect.

[Tatnic]

Thanks for your support Jim, but it is obvious that information I provide is not welcomed by many on this board. So be it. Good luck trading.

To be honest, there's not alot of difference between you two. YOu both spit out broad, sweeping predictions in a rapid fire manner, only to contradict them a few mintues later. Its like you're posting just so you can read your own words. I can't for a second believe that smitty makes any money...sorry Jim, but you're as phony as garbo.

[IIC]

To be honest, there's not alot of difference between you two. YOu both spit out broad, sweeping predictions in a rapid fire manner, only to contradict them a few mintues later. Its like you're posting just so you can read your own words. I can't for a second believe that smitty makes any money...sorry Jim, but you're as phony as garbo.

Geez Tat...I think you are tougher than I am...I always like to give people the benefit of the doubt...At first anyway.

So here's my take for the summer:

The Naz will either go up or down...But if it doesn't...It'll be flat