AOB ==> The CHRISMUKKAH Winner

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lemonjello
    replied
    da beat down

    Did those two nerds win the NOBEL PRIZE?

    Sharpe:1990 Economics Nobel laureate.

    The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1990 was awarded jointly to Harry M. Markowitz, Merton H. Miller and William F. Sharpe "for their pioneering work in the theory of financial economics"


    Case. Closed.


    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    Are you talking systematic risk or non-systematic risk? I would advocate the Jensen or Trainer method if it were the latter.

    Leave a comment:


  • IIC
    replied
    P/E is meaningless...Just ask WON

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    Originally posted by DSteckler View Post
    The "Risk" in investments typically is measured by the Sharpe ratio, Ernie. Not P/E ratio.
    Are you talking systematic risk or non-systematic risk? I would advocate the Jensen or Trainer method if it were the latter.

    Leave a comment:


  • skiracer
    replied
    I like the play to the upside over the short term to intermediate term but I need to see some consolidation of recent gains first. If the pullback takes place as I think it will the entry at 9.50 level could provide some very intense gains with a decent r/r. Here's my take on the daily and weekly charts. The weekly has an interesting formation within a formation which you don't see to often.



    Leave a comment:


  • DSteckler
    Guest replied
    The "Risk" in investments typically is measured by the Sharpe ratio, Ernie. Not P/E ratio.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    Originally posted by DSteckler View Post
    Bruce is correct. P/E has very little to do with the measurement of risk.
    It depends how you define "risk". If a company's PE is low, that means that, all things being equal, its stock price is less susceptible to negative changes in its earnings stream.

    Leave a comment:


  • DSteckler
    Guest replied
    Bruce is correct. P/E has very little to do with the measurement of risk.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tatnic
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    Actually you're wrong. The P/E of my portfolio is MUCH lower than that of the S&P 500...so my holdings are less risky.
    Don't believe everything you read on the internet.... P/E ratio is a lousy measure of risk, probably one of the worst.

    Leave a comment:


  • blessed
    replied
    Totally agree with MM ....AOB just on a pause

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    entry schmentry...if the earnings are there, you can't keep a good stock down.

    Leave a comment:


  • New-born baby
    replied
    Originally posted by lemonjello View Post
    NB,

    if you bought it down at 9.1 would you still hold for MM's target? Or maybe just use a floating stop and hope it turns into AXR?
    Actually I bought it much lower than $9.10 and I cut it loose at $10.04. Too soon, eh?

    I would not buy AOB right now. I would look for an entry at $9.10 or $9.00, but if $9 fails that means she moves back into the $7- range where I got it the first time. But I think she bounces at $9.10 and moves up again. She's just bearish right now. Look at the chart; wouldn't take too much to make a head and shoulders top.

    As to your question, I would consider a $9.10 entry, put a close stop under it at $8.97, and 1st target the left shoulder's top; 2nd target the head; and third target would be to sell half and let her run.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrmarket
    replied
    Originally posted by lemonjello View Post
    Congratulations. You've approximated the S&P on a non-risk adjusted basis.
    Actually you're wrong. The P/E of my portfolio is MUCH lower than that of the S&P 500...so my holdings are less risky.

    Leave a comment:


  • alice4321us
    replied
    Support is at 10

    Originally posted by New-born baby View Post
    MM,
    What he is saying is that $9.10 is an excellent place to buy the stock. Make 30% instead of 15%. That would be HUGE, ya know.
    Looking at the chart it seems first major support is at 10 and then 50 MA which is 9.11 ??

    Leave a comment:


  • lemonjello
    replied
    Congratulations. You've approximated the S&P on a non-risk adjusted basis.

    Originally posted by mrmarket View Post
    if I take my total position at the beginning of 2006 and compare it to what I have now, I am up over 15%..yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • lemonjello
    replied
    NB,

    if you bought it down at 9.1 would you still hold for MM's target? Or maybe just use a floating stop and hope it turns into AXR?


    Originally posted by New-born baby View Post
    MM,
    What he is saying is that $9.10 is an excellent place to buy the stock. Make 30% instead of 15%. That would be HUGE, ya know.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X