Originally posted by mrmarket
View Post
When Saddam Hangs
Collapse
X
-
THE SKIRACER'S EDGE: MAKE THE EDGE IN YOUR FAVOR
-
-
Originally posted by billyjoe View PostSki,
Wasn't it The Good (Eastwood) the Bad (Lee Van Cleef) and the Ugly (Eli Wallach) 1966
---------billyjoe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXlda...related&search=BEEF!... it's whats for dinner!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by skiracer View PostYou hit the nail right on the head Ernie. You would have to be pretty naive to believe everything is on the up and up with that Haliburton situation. It's been a sore spot with me since the beginning of the whole situation and they are all either getting or will be getting rich off of this Iraq thing. Their attitude stinks. They aren't men enough to admit their idea and no plan concept has failed in Iraq and that American boys are dying everyday at an alarming rate for what, a failed plan and weak leaders. As a society we are close to moral failure, our choice of leaders this time around was dismal, and take a good close look at where we as a nation are being led by our so called visionaries. We are in a terrible situation.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lyehopper View PostBlondie, Angel Eyes and Tuco.... Great movie, one of my all time favorites.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXlda...elated&search=
I just watched it. It's so good at the last gunfight in the arena.THE SKIRACER'S EDGE: MAKE THE EDGE IN YOUR FAVOR
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by New-born baby View PostHanging Saddam is a good thing, and would not have been possible unless President Bush had sent the troops into Iraq. Besides getting rid of Saddam we also got rid of a major source of cash for terrorists. He was funding them.
Since we've gone into iraq we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars, lost as many lives as we did in the 911 attacks, and what do we have to show for it? One little, insignificant dictator that kept a lid on that place for the past few decades (with alot of help from us, remember those pictures of donnie rumsfeld sipping tea with saddam?)...maybe we should have kept him in charge of security.
Iraq is beyond repair but we just keep throwing good money and troops into that hell hole hoping for a miracle. Its also come to light that bushie has lied through his teeth about the conditions in iraq...sound familiar? Of course he didn't learn any lessons from our little disaster in Nam because he was drunk most of the time, missing in action so to speak.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tatnic View PostI believe I read somewhere that most of the cash that funds the terrorists comes from the saudis. Don't hold your breath waiting for bush to do anything about that though.
Since we've gone into iraq we've spent hundreds of billions of dollars, lost as many lives as we did in the 911 attacks, and what do we have to show for it? One little, insignificant dictator that kept a lid on that place for the past few decades (with alot of help from us, remember those pictures of donnie rumsfeld sipping tea with saddam?)...maybe we should have kept him in charge of security.
Iraq is beyond repair but we just keep throwing good money and troops into that hell hole hoping for a miracle. Its also come to light that bushie has lied through his teeth about the conditions in iraq...sound familiar? Of course he didn't learn any lessons from our little disaster in Nam because he was drunk most of the time, missing in action so to speak.THE SKIRACER'S EDGE: MAKE THE EDGE IN YOUR FAVOR
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by New-born baby View PostHanging Saddam is a good thing, and would not have been possible unless President Bush had sent the troops into Iraq. Besides getting rid of Saddam we also got rid of a major source of cash for terrorists. He was funding them.
Who can one blame except the people who propogated it initially, got us solidly entrenched, and have no idea of how to cope with it in a realistic manner. Hanging Saddam is not the answer or will it provide an answer. Taking the Taliban out in Pakistan an Afganistan was good and we should have moved in and kept them out while stopping and controlling everything going in an out until we strangled Iraq and the terrorists in Iraq and Pakistan. We had a good look at the defeat of a super power in the Russian's fiasco in Afganistan and we didn't learn a thing. Now we are in another very bad predicament again that is ripping our own country apart in a number of ways. When you take a good close look at the situation, realistically who is winning, us or the other side. Is it our advantage at this point in the war in Iraq?Last edited by skiracer; 12-27-2006, 11:20 PM.THE SKIRACER'S EDGE: MAKE THE EDGE IN YOUR FAVOR
Comment
-
-
Speaking of the Taliban...I heard on the radio last night that heroin deaths in Los Angeles are at an all time high. They were attributing that to the influx of heroin from Afghanistan...They said 1/6 of L.A.'s heroin originates from there now. Apparently the Taliban kept a lid on it and now the farmers are going crazy growing poppies."Trade What Is Happening...Not What You Think Is Gonna Happen"
Find Tomorrow's Winners At SharpTraders.com
Follow Me On Twitter
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by New-born baby View PostHanging Saddam is a good thing, and would not have been possible unless President Bush had sent the troops into Iraq. Besides getting rid of Saddam we also got rid of a major source of cash for terrorists. He was funding them.
Alternatively, the economic sanctions and blockades were crippling his ability to be a threat to anyone outside of Iraq. Eventually, he would have withered away at a much lower cost of money and lives.
Was he a bad guy? Of course he was. Would more Iraqi civilians have died under his terror reign than the number who have been killed in this war and in the civil war to be? I don't think so.=============================
I am HUGE! Bring me your finest meats and cheeses.
- $$$MR. MARKET$$$
Comment
-
-
Tonight the Hallmark Channel , #49 here , is showing "Hang 'Em High" , with Clint Eastwood and a cast of big stars. I think it would be a fitting gesture to have a private showing for Sadam. Only one part I object to is when they hang the innocent 16 year old ,billyjoe, who was guilty of rustling ,but didn't murder the rancher and his son. Some of the supporting cast : Inger Stevens, Ed Begley, Bruce Dern, Allan Hale Jr., and Ben Johnson.
----------billyjoe
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by billyjoe View PostTonight the Hallmark Channel , #49 here , is showing "Hang 'Em High" , with Clint Eastwood and a cast of big stars. I think it would be a fitting gesture to have a private showing for Sadam. Only one part I object to is when they hang the innocent 16 year old ,billyjoe, who was guilty of rustling ,but didn't murder the rancher and his son. Some of the supporting cast : Inger Stevens, Ed Begley, Bruce Dern, Allan Hale Jr., and Ben Johnson.
----------billyjoeTHE SKIRACER'S EDGE: MAKE THE EDGE IN YOUR FAVOR
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Websman View PostI don't see how hanging anybody could be a "good thing". It is true that execution of killers is legal and justified, but I would never consider it to be good.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tatnic View PostGood point...and especially in his case since that's exactly what he wants, ie to die a martyr. He has said that he wants to be sacrificed in the name of his country. Its interesting to note that in the middle east hanging someone is considered human treatment...they usually just tortue them for a few weeks before cutting off their heads. So at least the country is showing some progress!=============================
I am HUGE! Bring me your finest meats and cheeses.
- $$$MR. MARKET$$$
Comment
-
Comment