I see we have left all pretense at being scientific. Well, people who like their global warming, hoax or not, served with vitriol and rhetoric, might try the newsgroup alt.global-warming. Warning: there is a rather low signal to noise ratio there.
Keep posting here too, if you like, but I am not very interested in malicious stuff (see the link in the previous post, or don't: it really is a sick article) that mostly evades the issues. But if someone wants to take the trouble to post it, by all means go ahead.
BTW, I do not consider the lack of scientific criticism of GW presented here as an indication that GW proponents have the field to themselves, but only as an indication that few people here seem to be interested in other things than comforting soundbites. The scientists need to battle things out among themselves (and the consensus for global warming, and man-made global warming, is growing).
BTW Pete, did you see "An Inconvenient Truth"?
Regards,
Karel
Keep posting here too, if you like, but I am not very interested in malicious stuff (see the link in the previous post, or don't: it really is a sick article) that mostly evades the issues. But if someone wants to take the trouble to post it, by all means go ahead.
BTW, I do not consider the lack of scientific criticism of GW presented here as an indication that GW proponents have the field to themselves, but only as an indication that few people here seem to be interested in other things than comforting soundbites. The scientists need to battle things out among themselves (and the consensus for global warming, and man-made global warming, is growing).
BTW Pete, did you see "An Inconvenient Truth"?
Regards,
Karel
Comment