Spike that RATE looks pretty darn good. Might even look better at your "C" point.
Spike's Scientific Stock Analysis
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by RunnerSpike that RATE looks pretty darn good. Might even look better at your "C" point.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by spikefaderYeah it would. Only problem is that 'c' doesn't always drop below the 'a', and if this one does now it would be a break of the channel long day. I am going to assume that this is a short 'c' that won't breach the 'a' low.
Spike, not sure how much your into EW if RATE bounces off your “c” then what we have here is called a flat. These guys terminate just slightly under the “a”., but based on probabilities I’d feel comfortable taking it off that nice support line you have shown on the chart only if it bounces and volume increases.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by RunnerSpike, not sure how much your into EW if RATE bounces off your “c” then what we have here is called a flat. These guys terminate just slightly under the “a”., but based on probabilities I’d feel comfortable taking it off that nice support line you have shown on the chart only if it bounces and volume increases.Anything beyond 'c' and I get bored lol The way I look at it is 'c' is a line in the sand, and it either holds or it doesn't.
Are you saying that according to EW flats always drop below 'a'? In "Spike EW" (haha) I just call them 'c' and they may or may not go below 'a'. Either way, it doesn't matter much except perhaps with regard to stop locations. Suits my purposes, and apologies to any true EWers out there.
I've got plenty of valid looking 'counts' (my counts anyway) that show the that they don't, so I'm happy trading them as if they may or may not, and don't need them to before I take it.
Thanks.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dmk112Spike,
Can you take a look at this thread, we had a discussion in regard to the log and linear scale, which one to use? Both?
http://www.mrmarketishuge.com/showpo...&postcount=911
Comment
-
Comment