The Babe's Trades

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by billyjoe View Post
    Explanation for 9% jump. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/equity...190102871.html


    ---------------billy
    Just saw it. Yea! Happy Thanksgiving. Comment on SA: "KevinPorterComments (403)
    1 Juror deliberations
    2 Potential mistrial declarations
    3 Rendering of the verdict
    4 Post-verdict legal motions
    5 Judicial judgment and mandates
    6 Appeals

    we are at number 3

    4 - Google has up to 11/29 to file post-verdict motions
    and Vringo up to 12/07 for the same

    5 - THEN you get final judgement including possible math error correction and future royalties"

    Leave a comment:


  • billyjoe
    replied
    Vrng

    Explanation for 9% jump. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/equity...190102871.html


    ---------------billy

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by billyjoe View Post
    River, I e-mailed my son asking if he wanted me to sell his VRNG for a gain of $11. He sent me this article http://seekingalpha.com/article/9993...-for-the-trees I guess running royalties is not a bad thing to have. He's holding.

    -----------------billy
    Go Steve! http://seekingalpha.com/article/1000...readmore&ifp=0

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by billyjoe View Post
    River, I e-mailed my son asking if he wanted me to sell his VRNG for a gain of $11. He sent me this article http://seekingalpha.com/article/9993...-for-the-trees I guess running royalties is not a bad thing to have. He's holding.

    -----------------billy
    LOL. Stevekimlaw is one of the good guys. I'm still holding too. I just submitted a question there but got an auto-response that said the SA editors have to approve first. Don't see it yet. Has to do with Judge ruling on Validity of Lang patents on basis of obviousness.

    Leave a comment:


  • billyjoe
    replied
    River, I e-mailed my son asking if he wanted me to sell his VRNG for a gain of $11. He sent me this article http://seekingalpha.com/article/9993...-for-the-trees I guess running royalties is not a bad thing to have. He's holding.

    -----------------billy

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Vrng

    Billy, keep an eye on Yahoo MB. Apparent math confusion by jury. Think Judge to correct. Still holding. It ain't over yet.

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Took a shower. Came back to see halt lifted and VRNG trading just like a biotech stock on good news. Should trade higher tomorrow after this huge sell off (I hope) and judge's rulings on running royalties. Time to go vote.

    Leave a comment:


  • billyjoe
    replied
    Trading halted. I'm changing my numbers. Well it's worth a try. They accepted my cancel and replace with higher numbers. Now a waiting game.

    ------------billy

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Vrng halted. Here's the news!

    Trial Update: Verdict In - Vringo Wins
    By edvacourt . 1 minute 15 seconds ago . Permalink
    Infringement determined against all defendants on all claims. Patents are valid and there was no finding of obviousness. Damages: Running Royalty based on 3.5%. Jury awarded $30 million in damages covering all defendants. It sets up for Judge Jackson to use that figure for future royalties. My guess that the total all-in to Vringo is going to be $550-$600 million.

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by billyjoe View Post
    As of Oct. 15th, 77.1% of VRNG's float was held short (seeking alpha)

    10/15/12 open-4.78 high 4.78 low 4.45 close 4.66. As we approach 5, all hell could break loose. High today 4.42.

    ------------billy
    10/9/12 52wk hi of 5.73, when judge denied GOOG summary judgement. That's the number guiding me to 6+ min.

    Leave a comment:


  • billyjoe
    replied
    River, We used to have a party line with several old ladies that would gossip for hours. That ended around 1966 ?

    VRNG now 4.25. At 4.50 son #1 cashes in. At 4.50 son #2 cashes in. Me, I haven't thought that far ahead yet.

    ----------------billy

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by billyjoe View Post
    I'm the treasurer of our local historical society. Around the turn of the century some ner-do-wells attempted to rob the local bank. Upstairs, at the phone exchange, the all night phone operator aged 14 slept on a cot. The bad guys gagged her, tied her up, and tried to dynamite the bank vault but it didn't work. They left town and were never caught. The girl lived to her 90's dying in the 1980's. Too bad nobody recorded her version of the crime. We do have the newspaper stories. Imagine today a 14 year old working the midnight shift alone . Times have certainly changed.

    ----------------billy
    Love your stories billy. My grandmother had one of those tall black phones with the speak-into piece on a pole and the hearing-piece attached by a cord for holding against your ear. No telephone exchange needed. Our number was 55535. Re. the 14-year-old, we didn't use locks on our doors.

    Leave a comment:


  • riverbabe
    replied
    Originally posted by Deaddog View Post
    Hey Babe:

    How's the stress level?
    Heh. Just fine. Ready for another ciggie but worried about having to go outside (downstairs on deck) for it. Assuming you all saw this latest from edvacourt re. latest jury question:

    "Ok folks...this is getting better. The question is...If we assign a cash amount now is that in addition to the running royalty rate. Judges answer was yes but he goes further because the jury is instructed to pick a damages amount for each defendant. We already know that they have asked how far to go back when considering these damages and this makes what they are considering just that much clearer now. My guess now is that in addition to running royalties we see a considerable damages figure as I suggested in an earlier post. The judge has instructed them that if you have made a determination that a running royalty rate or lumps sum is to be used then you must go on to fill in all of the damages (by defendant) on the verdict form #3C. I'm getting excited and you should be too."

    Leave a comment:


  • Deaddog
    replied
    Hey Babe:

    How's the stress level?

    Leave a comment:


  • billyjoe
    replied
    As of Oct. 15th, 77.1% of VRNG's float was held short (seeking alpha)

    10/15/12 open-4.78 high 4.78 low 4.45 close 4.66. As we approach 5, all hell could break loose. High today 4.42.

    ------------billy

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X